Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
2.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 38(3): 681-688, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1023340

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The main purpose and research question of the study are to compare the efficacy of high-security closed versus open devices for human oocytes' vitrification. METHODS: A prospective randomized study was conducted. A total of 737 patients attending the Infertility and IVF Unit at S.Orsola University Hospital (Italy) between October 2015 and April 2020 were randomly assigned to two groups. A total of 368 patients were assigned to group 1 (High-Security Vitrification™ - HSV) and 369 to group 2 (Cryotop® open system). Oocyte survival, fertilization, cleavage, pregnancy, implantation, and miscarriage rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed on survival rate (70.3% vs. 73.3%), fertilization rate (70.8% vs. 74.9%), cleavage rate (90.6% vs. 90.3%), pregnancy/transfer ratio (32.0% vs. 31.8%), implantation rate (19.7% vs. 19.9%), nor miscarriage rates (22.1% vs. 21.5%) between the two groups. Women's mean age in group 1 (36.18 ± 3.92) and group 2 (35.88 ± 3.88) was not significantly different (P = .297). A total of 4029 oocytes were vitrified (1980 and 2049 in groups 1 and 2 respectively). A total of 2564 were warmed (1469 and 1095 in groups 1 and 2 respectively). A total of 1386 morphologically eligible oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (792 and 594 respectively, P = .304). CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the replacement of the open vitrification system by a closed one has no impact on in vitro and in vivo survival, development, pregnancy and implantation rate. Furthermore, to ensure safety, especially during the current COVID-19 pandemic, the use of the closed device eliminates the potential samples' contamination during vitrification and storage.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Oocytes/physiology , Oocytes/virology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/standards , Adult , Cryopreservation/methods , Cryopreservation/standards , Embryo Implantation/physiology , Embryo Transfer/methods , Female , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Fertilization in Vitro/standards , Humans , Italy , Oocyte Donation/methods , Oocyte Donation/standards , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods
3.
J Endocrinol Invest ; 43(8): 1153-1157, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-973722

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The recent pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) due to coronavirus (CoV) 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has raised several concerns in reproductive medicine. The aim of this review is to summarize available evidence providing an official position statement of the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) METHODS: A comprehensive Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, Medline and Cochrane library search was performed. Due to the limited evidence and the lack of studies, it was not possible to formulate recommendations according to the Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence criteria. RESULTS: Several molecular characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 can justify the presence of virus within the testis and possible alterations of spermatogenesis and endocrine function. Orchitis has been reported as a possible complication of SARS-CoV infection, but similar findings have not been reported for SARS-CoV-2. Alternatively, the orchitis could be the result of a vasculitis as COVID-19 has been associated with abnormalities in coagulation and the segmental vascularization of the testis could account for an orchitis-like syndrome. Finally, available data do not support the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in plasma seminal fluid of infected subjects. CONCLUSION: Data derived from other SARS-CoV infections suggest that in patients recovered from COVID-19, especially for those in reproductive age, andrological consultation and evaluation of gonadal function including semen analysis should be suggested. Studies in larger cohorts of currently infected subjects are warranted to confirm (or exclude) the presence of risks for male gametes that are destined either for cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen or for assisted reproduction techniques.


Subject(s)
Andrology/standards , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Cryopreservation/standards , Fertility Preservation/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Spermatozoa/physiology , Andrology/trends , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Cryopreservation/trends , Fertility Preservation/trends , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Semen Analysis/standards , Semen Analysis/trends , Sexual Health/standards , Societies, Medical/standards
4.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 41(6): 991-997, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-759281

ABSTRACT

Reopening fertility care services across the world in the midst of a pandemic brings with it numerous concerns that need immediate addressing, such as the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on the male and female reproductive cells and the plausible risk of cross-contamination and transmission. Due to the novelty of the disease the literature contains few reports confirming an association of SARS-CoV-2 with reproductive tissues, gametes and embryos. Cryobanking, an essential service in fertility preservation, carries the risk of cross-contamination through cryogenic medium and thus calls for risk-mitigation strategies. This review aims to address the available literature on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 on tissues, gametes and embryos, with special reference to the possible sources of cross-contamination through liquid nitrogen. Strategies for risk mitigation have been extrapolated from reports dealing with other viruses to the current global crisis, for safety in fertility treatment services in general, and specifically for oncofertility.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cryopreservation , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Fertility Preservation , Germ Cells , Pandemics , Cryopreservation/standards , Female , Fertility Preservation/methods , Fertility Preservation/standards , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infection Control/standards , Male , SARS-CoV-2/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL